
Reply
Recent blog posts
- Different Vols Team Shows Up, Hammers Ohio 83-68
- JOE FRUGAL: Stretching $100 Through "Just Between Friends" Consignment Sale
- Are The Ohio Bobcats This Year's Cinderella?
- JOE FRUGAL: Coupon Deal on "Twilight: New Moon" Saturday
- Poor Coaching By Pearl, Vols Barely Advance
- Can Vols Find the Range This Time In NCAA Tournament?
- JOE FRUGAL: Save $5 to $10 on Disney's "Princess & The Frog"
- JOE FRUGAL: Free Dunkin Donuts Coffee to Wake You Up After the Time Change
- 3/15/10 Did a Tornado hit Tunnel Hill on Friday?
- From the Archive: The Record Snow Storm of 93
AP News Video
Recent comments
- GREAT!
1 day 17 hours ago - EXACTLY!!
1 day 17 hours ago - ILLEGAL
1 day 17 hours ago - HOLY CRAP!!
1 day 17 hours ago - Cops!
1 day 17 hours ago - BRAVE MEN?
1 day 17 hours ago - IGNORANT
1 day 17 hours ago - That will not accomplish much.
1 day 18 hours ago - busted
1 day 18 hours ago - legal and illegal?
1 day 18 hours ago



















H1N1 Shot
I am confused by this paragraph in the article:
The Health Department is offering the injectable vaccine to pregnant women, children ages 5-18 with health conditions and children 6 months through 23 months old. The nasal spray is available to healthy people ages two through 49.
What about children ages 3-4 with health conditions? This group should not get the flu mist and should be able to get the injectable. Where it states "children ages 5-18 with health conditions", is there a typo? Should it read children 3-18 with health conditions?
Thank you.