Reply
Recent blog posts
- Local High School Football Worth Watching This Friday
- From the Archive: On The Road Again with Charles Kuralt
- Mike Leach Offered UT Job?
- INTERVIEW: "Big Bang" Stars Johnny Galecki & Jim Parsons Chat About Sheldon & Leonard
- Video of Girl Falling Through Fence Raises Questions About Bluff Safety Here At Home
- Vols Dominate Mocs
- Celebrities WE Care About: Deborah Norville, JR Martinez, Bernie Mac, Randy Owen & the 50 Cent Connection
- 11/14/08 This Week's Garden of the Week!
- Former GOP Presidential Candidate Mike Huckabee Plans Visit To Chattanooga
- SEC News & Notes for 11/15/08
AP News Video
Recent comments
- obama and guns
13 hours 21 min ago - obama and guns
13 hours 26 min ago - Happy Birthday Lauryn
14 hours 7 min ago - I DON'T DRINK
14 hours 57 min ago - Hamilton County Adoption Fair - TN DCS won't let us adopt
15 hours 19 min ago - Retraction?
17 hours 22 min ago - It's time Tennessee (and
19 hours 6 min ago - Top Priority
20 hours 7 min ago - Guns by obama!!!
21 hours 41 min ago - GUNS
22 hours 50 min ago























Re:It seems to me that an
This is a common misconception. Any electric generation from the car's motion while powered is going to take away from propelling the car. The loss of efficiency in the motor and generator make this a losing proposition. Even if you could design a 100% efficient motor and a 100% efficient generator, the best this arrangement could do is break even with no added charge. This applies to wind power generators as well since the drag they create makes the car harder to move for the motor.
Where this theory DOES apply is in braking. The average car releases braking energy as heat. Cars that have regenerative braking are recovering that energy when slowing or stopping by using the motor as a generator. Regenerative braking may add 10% or so to an electric car's overall range.
Hope that helps.