Reply
Recent blog posts
- Bulldogs Dominate Vols
- Tennessee-Georgia "More Than Just a Game"
- 10/10/08 This Week's Garden of the Week!
- Weekend Schedule - SEC News & Notes
- Senator Lamar Alexander Says 67,000 Tennesseans Could Refinance Home Loans
- SEC East Still Anyone's Game
- From The Archives: The New TV Seasons (from years gone by)
- Vol Network Just Not the Same
- 10/7/08 Soddy Elementary 5th Grade!
- While the rest of us get political, CBS's Bob Schieffer goes Country
AP News Video
Recent comments
- Noboma
1 day 23 hours ago - Fabulous..... finally. I
1 day 23 hours ago - Ridiculous...........
2 days 22 min ago - Marti Rutherford
2 days 30 min ago - AT LAST
2 days 40 min ago - YOU DON'T KNOW SUFFERING!
2 days 1 hour ago - Just wondering if the
2 days 2 hours ago - Interesting!
2 days 2 hours ago - Disgusted
2 days 3 hours ago - Happy birthday Cassandra!!!
2 days 4 hours ago























Some concerns...
Christianity has been influenced many ways over the past 2000 or so years by OTHER religions. This influence has included everything from church doctrine to decisions as to which of the original texts were / were not included in the Bible. So if it were truly a history course - I personally am curious as to WHY the course utilizes ONLY the Bible ?
There is also the concern of - is it really a history course about the Bible e.g. findings / current scientific beliefs concerning when the original texts were written ( and who wrote what )... why certain texts were included and some excluded ... how the inclusion / exclusion of those texts affected the continued genesis of the Christian religion... and so forth...
OR...
Is it being taught as thought the Bible is an 'accurate' documentation of history - based on the teacher's ( or ? ) personal interpretation e.g. the world is only 6000 years old and on quiet days Jesus used to take his late model dinosaur and go cruising around town... ?