
Reply
Recent blog posts
- Different Vols Team Shows Up, Hammers Ohio 83-68
- JOE FRUGAL: Stretching $100 Through "Just Between Friends" Consignment Sale
- Are The Ohio Bobcats This Year's Cinderella?
- JOE FRUGAL: Coupon Deal on "Twilight: New Moon" Saturday
- Poor Coaching By Pearl, Vols Barely Advance
- Can Vols Find the Range This Time In NCAA Tournament?
- JOE FRUGAL: Save $5 to $10 on Disney's "Princess & The Frog"
- JOE FRUGAL: Free Dunkin Donuts Coffee to Wake You Up After the Time Change
- 3/15/10 Did a Tornado hit Tunnel Hill on Friday?
- From the Archive: The Record Snow Storm of 93
AP News Video
Recent comments
- GREAT!
2 days 9 hours ago - EXACTLY!!
2 days 9 hours ago - ILLEGAL
2 days 9 hours ago - HOLY CRAP!!
2 days 9 hours ago - Cops!
2 days 9 hours ago - BRAVE MEN?
2 days 9 hours ago - IGNORANT
2 days 9 hours ago - That will not accomplish much.
2 days 10 hours ago - busted
2 days 10 hours ago - legal and illegal?
2 days 10 hours ago



















infringed.
Naifeh:
"Restricting and criminalizing access to over 190,000 concealed weapons permit holders records does nothing for the protection of Tennessee's 6.5 million residents."
Me:
It does damned little against them, since permit holders tend NOT to commit crimes (which would jeopardize their permits, their second-amendment rights, and their very freedom.)
It must also be said that building a database of firearms ownership (aside from being questionable legally), does nothing for the privacy of the permit holders.
Also, please explain how a law that lets one carry a sidearm into a restaurant that happens to have beer and/or wine on the menu, "perverts the right to keep and bear arms into a law that only recognizes a select few". What, you mean the select few who can afford to eat there? Or maybe the select few who choose not to cook that evening? If I carry for self-defense, why should that right be suspended as I'm eating dinner at Outback?